From the official document released by the court, the level is too low, with too many subjective words and improper wording.
One might think it's a novel being written.
Moreover, the entire text emphasizes shifting blame.
At the end, it highlights the excellence of the murdered judge, listing a bunch of honors to show that the fault does not lie with them.
But...
The fact that such an imprecise document can be issued is enough to illustrate what kind of people are in the court.
As for Judge Wang's professional level, others can make their own judgments based on this case.
I have seen some people within the system who have completely lost touch with the suffering of the world.
Only hospitalized for 15 days, so the compensation for lost work is calculated for 15 days.
I really can't understand this no matter how I think about it.
In our hospital, if you have your gallbladder removed, you are only given 3 days, and in some cases, 5 days.
If you give birth, it's 3 days for a natural birth and 5 days for a cesarean.
If you fracture a bone, once it's set, you're sent home; after all, there's not much difference between being hospitalized and staying at home.
In the three examples I've given, who can immediately return to work after being discharged?
The law states that compensation for lost work is not calculated based on the duration of hospitalization but according to medical advice.
In this case, would you dare to release the medical advice given at the time of discharge for everyone to see? Let us see what the situation was at discharge?
If you truly believe that he could only work after 29 days, then may I ask why the remaining 14 days are not counted by the judge?
Do you think everyone is like her, from a wealthy family, so taking a break at home for ten days or half a month is no big deal?
Do you not know how people at the bottom struggle to make a living?
Moreover, I also want to know, with legal aid suggesting 18,000, what was the judge thinking when offering 9,000? Did he insist on appealing, lowering your mediation rate, and that made you unhappy?
In any case, in recent years, I haven't seen any good judges in the news that has come out...
Some commenters believe I have a biased stance.
Let me clarify, my call for the public release of medical advice, court documents, and trial recordings is not to prove that the judge has issues.
On the contrary, I want to use these indisputable items to prove that this old man is a murderous maniac, and how fair and selfless the deceased judge's ruling was.
I hope the local court can release these items as soon as possible.
I have worked in legal affairs at a state-owned enterprise for a few years.
The approval procedures at state-owned enterprises are cumbersome.
When encountering payments that exceed the authority of the handling personnel and are difficult to pay,
it is generally suggested that the other party file a lawsuit,
not out of any grudges, but to make things easier for everyone,
because a judgment can replace any approval procedures,
and it doesn't matter how much is awarded.
I think the insurance company thinks the same way.
I always thought that if you hit an elderly person while driving and are fully responsible, you basically have to support them for life, but I didn't expect that 9,000 yuan could solve it; it seems honest people can't do it.
This plaintiff, a fifty-year-old man, was hit by a truck, and the other party was fully responsible. While hospitalized, he faced a compensation offer of 12,000 from the insurance company, and he only wanted to ask for an additional 6,000.
You should know that many elderly people nowadays dare to ask for tens of thousands in compensation from innocent passersby who kindly help them.
This plaintiff is clearly an honest person, reasonable, but as you can see, this is what happens to honest people.
Stupid or bad, you judge for yourselves.
The plaintiff demands 18,000, and the defendant is willing to pay 12,000.
Any normal person, even a neighborhood committee elder, would only negotiate between 12,000 and 18,000.
No one would come up with 9,000 or 27,000.
That's called stupid.
From a legal perspective, there has never been a case where work-related injuries = hospitalization dates.
If that's how it is calculated, then if someone is not hospitalized, it wouldn't count as a work-related injury. So, since Judge Wang wasn't hospitalized, does that mean no compensation is needed?
What a low level of professional ability.
It's hard to imagine a 37-year-old judge could be this foolish.
So the conclusion is that Judge Wang thinks the old man suing her is a hassle, so she deliberately makes things difficult for others.
But 9,000 yuan is nothing to someone driving a Land Rover; it's just a few times' worth of gas money.
For the old man, however, it's a matter of life and death. Not daring to stay the full 29 days in the hospital shows how important 9,000 yuan is to him.
You want someone's life, and they want yours.
That's very normal.
I don't know what else to say to the judge's family to calm them down; your thoughts are very dangerous!
When you find "scholars disrupting the law with literature," you unconsciously begin to lean towards "heroes breaking the law with force."
The main consequence of the government's declining credibility is:
Once something happens, the first thing the public does is not condemn the murderer but question whether the murderer received some unfair treatment that led to such extreme behavior.
If it were as gentle as a spring breeze, there wouldn't be any incidents. Think about it: if the judge were hit, would it also be 9,000 in compensation?
In "Water Margin," Wang Po says: "I handle things without a drop of water leaking; no matter where you sue, I will win for sure."
Just look at Wu Song, who walks towards her, having lost everything because of her...
These two matters are unrelated, just saying casually; everyone, don't jump to conclusions.
In "Water Margin," Wang Po says: "I handle things without a drop of water leaking; no matter where you sue, I will win for sure."
Just look at Wu Song, who walks towards her, having lost everything because of her...
These two matters are unrelated, just saying casually; everyone, don't jump to conclusions.
Otherwise, murderers' descendants can't take the civil service exam for three generations, right? What?! No descendants?
Then stop the social security benefits for murderers' parents. What?! No parents?
Harass the murderer’s siblings at their workplaces, using power to get them fired. What?! No siblings?
Sentence them to death to deter criminals, right? What?! Already committed suicide?
These people writing little essays to whitewash the court don't dare to mention the public release of trial videos; they just keep saying the judgment is fine and the plaintiff is too bad.
These people writing little essays to whitewash the court don't dare to mention the public release of trial videos; they just keep saying the judgment is fine and the plaintiff is too bad.
Judges are judges; they understand and abide by the law, clearly knowing that if they retaliate, it becomes mutual fighting. They must maintain their integrity in the world.
Discretionary power is something judges have, and the people have it too.
Rebirth: You are the old man.
Please choose one option to eliminate.
A: The driver who hit you immediately calls the police and contacts a doctor, a driver with poor skills but good character.
B: Reduce your claims for mental damages and other requests, a smart and diligent insurance clerk.
C: Wang Jiajia.
I am quite interested in Judge Wang Jiajia's Weibo, Douban, and Xiaohongshu.
I want to see traces of Judge Wang Jiajia during her lifetime to reminisce about her.
Judge Wang Jiajia herself hasn't said anything.
Look at how these people in this answer are singing and dancing.
It's really frustrating.
If you ask me, as long as the old man achieves a suspended death sentence, it's a success.