Various "anti" have eliminated millions of elites, to the point where Germany started its attack with many unavailable officers on the defensive lines...
To put it bluntly, history cannot be examined in detail. The more you examine it, the more you realize that you have been deceived in the past.
In the early days of the Soviet Union, they adopted a surplus collection system, directly taking away the majority of food from rural farmers, forcing the people facing famine to rebel. The Soviet Union directly deployed machine guns and armored vehicles, ruthlessly suppressing the rebellious farmers. It was the strong resistance of the peasant army that made the Soviet Union unable to continue exploiting the farmers in such a cruel manner, and led to the introduction of the New Economic Policy.
There was also the Ukrainian famine and the Katyn Forest Massacre.
When you study history seriously, you will find that many things are not as glamorous as they used to be. Underneath these things are the cries and tears of countless innocent victims.
Author: Lao Hu Li Zhang Bai Lin
Link: https://www.zhihu.com/question/663101401/answer/3593487928
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
Left-wing regimes are actually very pragmatic. They have no moral bottom line and worship truth within the range of artillery fire, but they can do calculations.
Destroying your profits - the cost you need to pay to destroy =?
If it is a positive number, they will eliminate you. If it is a negative number, they will win you over.
For example, West Germany, if they mess with West Germany, the United States will get involved, and the cost is too high, so they can't do it.
For example, East Germany, if they mess with East Germany, the United States won't care, pure profit, so they go all out.
For example, Finland, if they mess with Finland, 200,000 Soviet troops will die, so they can't touch it.
For example, Czechoslovakia, the West can't control it, so they go all out.
And there's the Ukrainian famine, and the Katyn Forest Massacre.
With this kind of regime, we need to constantly make them pay a higher price than the benefits they gain. Either make ourselves stronger, or find a big brother to rely on.
In short, we can't be exposed, being exposed will get us eliminated. We can't join them either, joining them will get us locked up and beaten.
Of course, if you can become Stalin, then forget what I said.
Author: Jia Yu is not a turtle
Link: www.zhihu.com/questi...
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
To make their own people recognize the "advanced nature" of the Soviet Union, all they need to do is to manipulate the KGB.
But to make foreigners recognize the "advanced nature" of the Soviet Union, they can only use real money and silver.
You are not compatriots, you are coffee music, you are infidels, who are you to consider yourself as our own people? Don't be delusional.
In 1970, when Solzhenitsyn won the Nobel Prize in Literature, the Minister of Propaganda of the Soviet Communist Party Central Committee found him and said, "You should refuse this award, otherwise the people will have opinions about it." So Solzhenitsyn angrily said, "The people are just a bunch of assholes. You take them out when you need them, and stuff them back into your pants when you don't!"
Author: Chu Wei Yi
Link: www.zhihu.com/questi...
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
You don't understand the logic of how the Soviet Union operates.
The Soviet Union itself is a parasitic combination, composed of parasites and hosts.
These parasites are actually very clever. They don't parasitize in places without value. You can see the most chaotic places caused by parasites, Eastern Europe, South America, and Shandong. These places have abundant natural resources and no pesticide threats. So parasites love these places, they have the same starting point, why don't these parasites go to Afghanistan? Why not go to Pakistan? Simply because these places have no resources.
These parasites themselves have no production capacity at all, they can only exploit the hosts. If you ask them to dismantle things, they can do it immediately. But if you ask them to build something, they absolutely can't do it.
However, these parasites are also afraid of something. They are afraid that the hosts will realize their existence. So they must brainwash the hosts, saying things like, "The outside world is too chaotic, you can't survive without me" or "It's not me who chose you, it's you who chose me." In short, they must explain their legitimacy.
And for the parasitic relationship, the best state for the host is to be half-dead, able to withstand external changes and survive, but not too strong to cause its own destruction.
Author: Nightingale Legend
Link: www.zhihu.com/questi...
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
Their logic is to target those who can retaliate with the least revenge. So...
The only treaty that the Soviet Union did not tear up was the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact. Can you guess why?
It's not about being ruthless to their own people, but being ruthless to people within their military reach. Whether they are their own people or not. Not to mention their own people, even externally, they were very cruel to the Polish and Czech people.
However, they are very friendly to people outside their military reach. Black people in Africa can receive a large amount of assistance from the Soviet Union, and Cuba in Latin America can continuously fleece the Soviet Union. Vietnam can also keep asking the Soviet Union for money and supplies.
The key is whether they can defeat you, whether they can overpower you. Finland is a tough nut to crack, the Soviet Union suffered two major losses, although it is also within the Soviet Union's military reach, they treat Finland politely.
The core law of the Soviet-style regime: everything is for power.
In order to gain power, they can betray their country and nation without hesitation.
"Brest-Litovsk Treaty":
-
The contracting parties declare a ceasefire.
-
The Russian army will be completely demobilized, and before the conclusion of a general treaty, the Russian naval vessels will return to Russian ports or be immediately disarmed.
-
Russia renounces jurisdiction and sovereignty over Poland, Lithuania, Courland, Livonia, and Estonia.
-
Before the conclusion of a general treaty and the complete demobilization of the Russian army, Germany will continue to occupy the areas east of the aforementioned areas occupied by the German army on the eve of the signing of the treaty.
-
Russia immediately withdraws from the Ardahan, Kars, and Batumi regions (which are actually annexed by Turkey).
-
Russia recognizes the independence of Ukraine and Finland, immediately withdraws troops from Finland, Ukraine, and the Åland Islands, and guarantees the immediate conclusion of a treaty with Ukraine and recognition of the treaty between Ukraine, Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey.
-
Russia pays Germany 6 billion marks in war reparations.
-
Germany promises not to interfere in Soviet internal affairs and not to attack Russia from the Finnish side.
Explanation: This harsh treaty not only caused the Soviet Union to lose about 1 million square kilometers of land and nearly 50 million people, but also resulted in the loss of 90% of coal production, 73% of iron ore, 54% of industry, and 33% of railways in the occupied areas.
In order to consolidate power, they can trample on the lower limits of humanity without hesitation.
During the suppression of the peasant uprising in Tambov Province, the Soviet government's army used chemical weapons more than once. On August 23, 1921, the commander of an artillery brigade under the Soviet government army received a report from a brigade commander in Inza village, which proved this point: "On August 22, 1921, our unit consumed 160 shrapnel shells, 75 explosive shells, and 85 gas shells in the battle against bandits." Such archival documents indicate that the Soviet government army continuously used chemical weapons for several months.
The Soviet Union was the first and only regime to use gas shells against its own country's farmers.